Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Renu Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 720 of 2019 Appellant :- Renu Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Kaushal Kishore Mani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Piyush Sinha
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri K.K. Mani, learned counsel for the appellant. Sri Piyush Sinha has appeared for respondent no. 3.
The petitioner in the writ claims appointment as Mukhya Sewika on the basis of Bal Vikas Avam Pushtahar Examination, Uttar Pradesh ( Group 'C' post) conducted in the year 2001.
The petitioner is a general category candidate and it is admitted that in the said category the last selected candidate had obtained 126 marks whereas the marks obtained by the petitioner is 121 in all. Therefore, she has no right to be selected.
Since the submission was that certain posts for general category had remained unfilled, the writ Court had permitted the candidates lower in merit to make representation, if unfilled vacancies are still available.
In view of the above, we do not consider that any prejudice has been caused or that the grievance of the petitioner do not stand satisfied. The petitioner may represent if so advised. If the petitioner prefers a representation, it shall be decided expeditiously as far as possible within three months.
The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 SKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Renu Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Kaushal Kishore Mani