HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Writ Petition No. 20713 of 2009 Date: 19.06.2014 Between:
Ravula Pedda Venkataiah …Petitioner And Sub-Registrar, Midmanoor Mandal, Nalgonda District and 5 others.
…Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Writ Petition No. 20713 of 2009 O R D E R:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for 1st respondent and Sri P.Prabhakar Rao for respondents 2 to 6.
The petitioners pray for Mandamus declaring the action of 1st respondent in accepting sale deeds for registration of land in Sy.No.295 at Ibrahimpatnam Village; Sy.Nos.170, 175 and 176 of Perure Village, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District in spite of order of injunction in I.A.No.315 of 2005 in O.S.No.7 of 2006 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet as illegal and arbitrary.
From the prayer, it is clear that the 1st respondent shall be restrained from registering proposed sale deeds. Such registration is likely to contravene the order of injunction passed by the trial Court.
The 1st respondent filed counter affidavit and by way of reply, it is stated that he has not accepted any sale deed for registration of land in Sy.No.295 at Ibrahimpatnam Village; Sy.Nos.170, 175 and 176 of Perure Village, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District as alleged by the petitioners. It is further stated that the last transaction was in the year 2000. The 1st respondent brings to the notice of this Court that in accordance with the Government orders in G.O.Ms.No.620 Revenue (Regn.I) Department, dated 28.092002 as amended in G.O.Ms.No.497 Revenue (Regn.I) Department, dated 07.04.2003, if an order of injunction is granted by the competent civil Court against a party to the document and if the order of injunction is brought to the notice of the Sub-Registrar, the matter will not be proceeded with.
From the stand taken by the respondents, it is clear that the writ petition has been filed on mere apprehension and the counter further states that if there is an order of injunction and contrary to it, respondents 2 to 6 take steps to register a deed, it shall be open to the petitioners to bring the same to the notice of 1st respondent for due compliance.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
S.V.Bhatt,J Date: 19.06.2014 KLP