(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Tax Appeal is admitted for consideration of following substantial questions of law:
Whether the Hon. CESTAT, Ahmedabad is correct in stating that no mistake appears in the order of the Tribunal, though the decision of Supreme Court referred by the applicant was not considered?
Whether the Hon. CESTAT, is correct in not declaring the show cause notice as barred by limitation ?
Whether the Hon.CESTAT is correct in denying the benefit of Notification No.1/93 thought he department has not produced any evidence to prove the ownership of brand name by M/s.Raviraj Plastics Pvt. Ltd ?
Whether the Hon.CESTAT is correct in confirming the penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules read with Section 38A of Central Excise Act, 1944 ?
(Akil Kureshi J.) (Ms.Sonia Gokani, J.) (vjn) Top