Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15832 of 2018 Applicant :- Ravindra And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Rekha Dikshit,J.
Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that accused applicants have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the first information report was lodged after 10 days of the incident and the prosecution failed to explain the delay. It is further submitted that the applicants have neither given any application for marriage nor they have received any money or gift from the Government. It is also submitted that the applicants are not government servants. The accused applicants are languishing in jail since 06.03.2018. It is next submitted that the applicants are neither previous convict nor they have any criminal history. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicants of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicants are enlarged on bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicants.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Let the applicants, namely, Ravindra and Vinit, involved in Case Crime No.158 of 2018, under Sections 420, 409, 34 IPC, Police Station Dankaur, District Gautam Budh Nagar, be released on bail on their furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-
(i) The applicants shall file undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 30.4.2018 Anupam S/-