Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ravindra Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5981 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babu Lal Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the record.
2. This is thoroughly misconceived and ill-advised writ petition. It appears that there is some dispute with regard crop standing on Gata No. 142 area 0.332 Hectare and petitioner has come with the prayer that a writ of mandamus be issued to authorities to permit him to cut the sugar cane crop standing on the aforesaid land.
3. Such kind of dispute are not entertainable in writ jurisdiction and remedy lies in common law. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ravindra Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Babu Lal Ram