Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25718 of 2021 Applicant :- Ravi Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Garun Pal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Ravi seeking bail in Case Crime No. 233 of 2019, under Section 307 IPC, Police Station Farah, District Mathura, during pendency of trial.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has further submitted that role of firing has not been attributed to the applicant. The role of firing has been attributed to co-accused Sonu @ Sonveer.
He has next submitted that similarly placed co-accused Sonu @ Sonveer has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14367 of 2021, vide order dated 18.03.2021 and case of the applicant stands on the better footing as that of co-accused Sonu @ Sonveer, who has already been granted bail. He has next submitted that the applicant is in jail since 30.05.2021and has no criminal history to his credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate in the trial by all means. There is no chance of applicant fleeing from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses, as such he be released on bail.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail however, he did not dispute the fact as raised by learned counsel for the applicant.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, complicity of accused, nature and severity of punishment in case of conviction and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
Considering the rival submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that role of firing has been attributed to co- accused Sonu @ Sonveer, who has already been granted bail, without commenting upon merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
The bail application is accordingly allowed.
Let the applicant Ravi be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the dates fixed after release.
2. The applicant will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of order downloaded from the official website of the High Court, Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the parties concerned.
The concerned authority/court/official shall verify the authenticity of the computerized copy of the order from the official website of the High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 30.7.2021 v.k.updh.