IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.2229/2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
Ravi M.Reddy, Aged 59 years, S/o. C.M.Reddy, No.42, Nanjappa Road, Shanthinagar, Bengaluru ... PETITIONER (By Sri. M.Arun Ponappa, Adv.,) AND:
1. Smt. Manjula, Aged 37 years, W/o. Gangadhara, Koratgere Village, Kunigal Taluk, Tumkur District.
2. Smt.Sannamma, Aged 78 years, W/o. Late Siddaiah @ Ukkada Siddaiah, 3. Smt.Lolakshi, Aged 38 years, W/o. Late Periswamy, 4. Ramu, Aged 50 years, S/o. Late Siddaiah @ Ukkada Siddaiah, 5. Kumara, Aged 45 years, S/o. Late Siddaiah @ Ukkada Siddaiah, 6. K.Raju, Aged 22 years, S/o. Kumara, All residing at:
Palahally Village, Belagola Hobli, Srirangapatna Taluk, Mandya District-571 438.
7. Shankara, Aged 52 years, S/o Machaiah, 8. Smt. Saraswathi, Aged 48 years, W/o. Shankara, Both are resident of No.3605, 2nd Cross, Laxmidevamma Temple Street, Lashker Mohalla, Mysuru-570 001.
9. Zacharios Varikamakil, Dead by his legal representatives, 9(a). Fernandez Sebastian Jeerkassary.S.J, 9(b). Fernandez Sebastian Assarikerely, Both residing at St.Xavier’s School, No.4, Rajnivas Marg, Delhi-110 054.
10. Smt. Kousalya, Aged 40 years, W/o. Shivanna, Mahadevapura Village, Arakere Hobli, Srirangapatna Taluk, Mandya District-571 415.
11. Smt.Hemavathy, Aged 34 years, W/o. Jayaramu, Srinivasa Agrahara Village, K.Shettihalliy Hobli, Srirangapatna Taluk, Mandya District-571 807. … RESPONDENTS ********* This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to allow the writ petition by setting aside/quashing the impugned order vide Annx-F, dated 02.11.2018, in O.S.No.7/2011, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Srirangapatna.
This Petition coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 02.11.2018 in O.S.No.7/2011, vide Annexure-F, on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Srirangapatna ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S. No.7/2011 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE sac*