Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ravendra Pratap Singh @ Ravindra Pratap Singh @ Ravi And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 40
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2538 of 2021 Petitioner :- Ravendra Pratap Singh @ Ravindra Pratap Singh @ Ravi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned A.G.A. for the respondents 1 and 2; and perused the record.
The instant petition seeks quashing of the First Information Report dated 25.02.2021 registered as Case Crime No.77 of 2021, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C., P.S. Bidhnoo, District Kanpur Nagar.
The allegation in the First Information Report, which has been lodged by the brother of the victim Ankita (the petitioner no.2) is to the effect that his sister has been enticed away by the accused person.
The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the First Information Report by claiming that the victim Ankita Yadav is adult and that she has voluntarily married Ravendra Pratap Singh @ Ravindra Pratap Singh @ Ravi (petitioner no.1). Reliance has been placed on the High School Certificate of the victim which discloses her date of birth as 11.03.1998.
The learned A.G.A. has submitted that it would be appropriate that this petition be disposed off by requiring the investigating agency to determine the age of the victim and record the statement of the victim and, thereafter, take appropriate action as per law.
Having perused the record as it is not stated in the impugned FIR that the sister of the informant is aged above 18 years, we deem it appropriate to dispose off this petition by providing as follows:-
The petitioner no.1 shall produce the petitioner no.2 (Ankita Yadav) before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar by or before 30.04.2021. Upon her production, the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar shall proceed to record the statement of Ankita Yadav to ascertain whether any force has been used on her or she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner no.1. In case the victim deposes before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate that force has been used on her, the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate shall proceed to pass appropriate orders immediately in respect of the custody/protection of the victim. However, in case the victim deposes that she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner no.1 or any other person and that no force has been used on her, learned Magistrate shall call upon the Investigating Officer of the case and fix a date for appearance of the informant or the parents or natural guardian of the victim for the purpose of determining the age of the victim. On the date so fixed or within such reasonable time as may be required, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to determine the age of the victim as per law, keeping in mind the provisions that are applicable for determination of the age of a victim and may, if necessary, direct for ossification test/medical examination of the victim from a District Government Hospital. If the victim is found to be a minor, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to pass appropriate orders in respect of custody of the victim, as per law. However, in case the victim is found to be an adult, he shall proceed to record the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
On the basis of the statement of the victim and the age of the victim as determined above, the police shall submit report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.
The aforesaid exercise shall be completed preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the victim before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate. Till 30.04.2021, or the date on which the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in the above case. Thereafter, if the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, as directed above, the accused shall be dealt with as per the statement of the victim. Though, in the event the victim is found to be minor, the police would be free to take the investigation to its logical conclusion and may effect arrest of the accused.
It is further clarified that if the victim is not produced by the date fixed as above, there shall be no protection and the investigating agency shall be free to take all steps that may be necessary to bring the investigation to its logical conclusion.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed off. Order Date :- 8.4.2021 AKShukla/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ravendra Pratap Singh @ Ravindra Pratap Singh @ Ravi And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2021
Judges
  • Manoj Misra
Advocates
  • Prashant Kumar Singh