Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27806 of 2018 Applicant :- Ravendra @ Chunnu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
Heard Sri Manvendra Singh, Advocate holding brief of learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
Perused the record.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that according to the medical examination, the age of the victim-girl was found to be 19 years and according to her High School Certificate, she was approximately nearing 18 years and was just a little short. When she was examined by the Magistrate, she stated to have gone on her volition along with the applicant and also admitted to have contracted marriage with him. She expressed her desire to spend her life with the applicant and gave her statement that the FIR against the applicant has been wrongly lodged. Further submission is that actually because of disagreement of the parents of the victim to this relationship this false case was lodged against the applicant. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. It has also been pointed out that the accused is not having any criminal history and he is in jail since 10.7.2017 and that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence, the period of detention already undergone, the unlikelihood of early conclusion of trial and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.
Let the applicant-Ravendra alias Chunnu, involved in Case Crime No.563 of 2017, u/ss 363,366, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, P.S.- Kotwali, District-Fatehpur be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned on the following conditions :-
(1) The applicant will not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever.
(2) The applicant will personally appear on each and every date in the court and his personal presence shall not be exempted unless the court itself deems it fit to do so in the interest of justice.
It may be observed that in the event of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to proceed for the cancellation of applicant's bail.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
Order Date :- 30.7.2018 CPP/-