1. Heard learned advocates for the parties.
2. Shri Y.C. Contractor, learned advocate for the Respondent No.1-University, appears and submits that the matter may be kept on 7.11.2012 as the Respondents would like to file affidavit and place certain materials on record.
3. By the order dated 15.10.2012, the Respondent No.1-University, was already directed to issue necessary hall tickets to the petitioners in the ensuing B.Ed. examination and in continuation thereof, as and when forthcoming programme for conducting examination of B.Ed. is declared for the affiliated colleges with Respondent No.1- University at the end of academic session, the SCA/8134/2012 2/2 ORDER above directions shall be complied with.
4. The Telegram dated 16.10.2012 sent by officer of Respondent No.1-University, directly to this Court seeking adjournment and tendering apology and expressing their inability to comply with earlier assurances to file affidavit, is ordered to be taken on record.
In spite of the fact that the Respondent No.1-University, is represented through the advocate, who has already filed Vakalatnama, addressing the Telegram in the name of Judge, is deprecated and therefore to take appropriate action in this regard against respondents, the matter is ordered to be heard on 7.11.2012.
5. S.O. to 7th November 2012.
[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] chandresh