IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.41507 OF 2014 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
RATHNAKAR HEGDE S/O LATE B. HARIYANNA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1024 10TH MAIN, 1ST BLOCK 3RD STAGE BASAVESHWAR NAGAR BANGALORE-560 079.
(BY MR. ISMAIL M. MUSBA, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001.
2. DIRECTOR GENERAL & INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA STATE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560 002.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY NO.1, INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.
4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY … PETITIONER NO.1, INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.
(BY MR. VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, AGA) - - -
… RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATIONS DTD.19.7.2012 VIDE ANNEX-A AND A REPRESENTATION DTD.5.12.2013 VIDE ANNEX-B AND DIRECT THAT EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION BE CARRIED OUT AS AGAINST THE POLICE OFFICERS NAMED IN THE REPRESENTATION WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME, WHICH THE RESPONDENTS HAD UNDERTAKEN TO DO WITHIN A PERIOD OF 8 WEEKS FROM 2.6.2014 IN WP.NOS.12623-12624/2014, VIDE ANNEX-V AND WHICH THE RESPONDENT HAS FAILED TO DO & ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Mr.Ismail M.Musba, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent.
2. The writ petition is admitted for hearing.
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been considered and an endorsement has already been issued to the petitioner on 31.05.2013.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to him under law.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE SS