Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ratan Tempo Service vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1303 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ratan Tempo Service Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Mahajan,Gaurav Mahajan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.
Sri Amit Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner, who is the owner of the vehicle submits that the seized vehicle has already been released pursuant to the interim direction of this Court, therefore, the writ petition no longer survives.
Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 accepts the aforesaid statement.
In view of above, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 31.10.2018 A.Kr.*
[Ashok Kumar, J.] [Pankaj Mithal, J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ratan Tempo Service vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 October, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Amit Mahajan Gaurav Mahajan