Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It is alleged that one Drum containing 125 litres of kerosene oil was recovered from the house of the applicant for which he was not having any license.
The learned counsel for the applicant stated at the bar that the co-accused Karuna Shankar from whose house two drum kerosene oil was recovered has already been granted bail in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 642 of 2011 on 2.2.2011 by the Bench presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.S.Chauhan, J.
Considering the statement given at the bar and finding that a case of parity is made out, I feel that a case for bail is made out.
Let the accused-applicant Ratan Shankar, involved in Case Crime No. 818 of 2010 under section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, Police Station Kasimpur, District Hardoi be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned on following conditions that:
1.The accused shall attend the court in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.
2.He shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused.
3.He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
4.He will not temper with the evidence.
5.The applicant shall not seek any adjournment when the prosecution witnesses are present.
In case any condition is violated the courts concerned shall inform the High Court so that necessary steps may be taken for the cancellation of the bail.
However, it is made clear that if the above statement is found incorrect by learned A.G.A. at any point of time, then he may move the cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 9.2.2011 Sh