Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Rashmi Srivastava & Others vs State Of U P & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 46718 of 2002 Petitioner :- Smt. Rashmi Srivastava & Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Srivastava,Siddhartha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shashi Dhar Sahai
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioners have sought following relief:
“issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claims of petitioners for their appointment on the post of Primary Teachers.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioners are not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioners have lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Rashmi Srivastava & Others vs State Of U P & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Himanshu Srivastava Siddhartha Srivastava