Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rashid vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 30
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3222 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rashid Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kant Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Sri Vijay Kant Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ petition has become infrcutuous.
Sri Abhishek Srivastava, holding brief of Sri Arun Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the Gaon Sabha is present.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if there be any, shall stand discharged.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 p.s.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rashid vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Birla
Advocates
  • Vijay Kant Dwivedi

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.