Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rashid @ Rashid Ahmad And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 May, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2963 of 2021 Petitioner :- Rashid @ Rashid Ahmad And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bachchoo Lal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 through the video conferencing and perused the record.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 4.3.2021 registered as Case Crime No. 63 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act and 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act, 2019, Police Station Kotwali, District Jaunpur with a further prayer not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the said F.I.R.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are being unnecessarily harassed at the behest of the complainant. If the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioners be taken in entirety and charges are found to be proved, the petitioners cannot be awarded sentence of more than 7 years. In this view, the arrest of the petitioners should not be effectuated by the police personnel.
Per contra learned A.G.A. contended that the allegations made in the first information report cannot be aborted at this stage. The petitioners will have sufficient opportunity to rebut the allegations.
Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners, we do not find any cogent and convincing reason to quash the FIR, hence the prayer for quashing the FIR is refused.
The fact of the matter is that till date arrest has not been effectuated and this is mere apprehension of the petitioners that they would be arrested in breach of provisions as contained under Section 41(1)(b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C. Once there is statutory provision provided for then it is always expected that the said provisions would be adhered to and in case there is any violation of the same, complaint can also be made before the Magistrate concerned to remedy the situation.
In view of the above, it is hereby directed that in case arrest of petitioners is to be effectuated in the aforesaid case in which they are wanted, the concerned police personnel should deal with the matter in compliance of the provisions as contained under Section 41(1)(b) read with Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C.
It is further provided that if the investigation in this matter has been completed and police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
The party shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
Order Date :- 20.5.2021 A.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rashid @ Rashid Ahmad And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 May, 2021
Judges
  • Bachchoo Lal
Advocates
  • Dinesh Kumar Maurya