Court No. - 7
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23913 of 2019 Applicant :- Rashid @ Rakib @ Chhota Ansari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sadaful Islam Jafri,Shri Nazrul Islam Jafri ,Senior Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 80 of 2014, under Sections 395, 397, 412, 342 I.P.C., P.S. Civil Lines, District Moradabad with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The contention as raised at the bar by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that applicant is not named in the F.I.R.; that no recovery has been shown from the possession of applicant; that involvement of the applicant has been shown on the basis of the statement of co-accused; that there is no admissible evidence against him; that co-accused Naushi, Shadab, Shoeb, Shaukin, Saalim, Irfan, Rehan, Sartaj, Asif alias Tidda and Nanhey have already been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 22.09.2014, 15.01.2015, 14.08.2014, 14.08.2014, 22.08.2014, 16.10.2014, 24.11.2014, 27.02.2015 and 14.08.2014 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.31178 of 2014, 43357 of 2014, 24659 of 2014, 24767 of 2014, 26698 of 2014, 34933 of 2014, 37032 of 2014, 7734 of 2015 and 20778 0f 2015, respectively; that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of the co-accused persons, who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity; that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial and that he is languishing in jail since 30.04.2014.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the submission of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicant and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
Let the applicant Rashid @ Rakib @ Chhota Ansari involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial Court
(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission, of which applicant is suspected.
(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or temper with the evidence.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it would be open to the prosecution to move for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 10.6.2019 Atul