Leave to amend.
Request is made to delete the name of respondent No.3 herein since he is not required as party respondent. Request is acceded to. Necessary amendment in the cause title be carried out forthwith.
Learned advocate for the petitioner Ms.Ketty Mehta urges that that there is saving clause by way of provision of Section 30 of the Gujarat Civil Courts Act,2005 and District Judge on his own could not have returned the papers to be presented to the High Court for the purpose of appeal and serious question of law arises as to whether by afflux of law, the District Judge would have an authority to sit in an appeal over the order of this Court passed on 11.10.1995.
Notice to respondents No.1 and 2, returnable on 3.7.2012.
Over and above the regular mode of service, let notice to the respondents be issued through Speed Post.
Direct service permitted.
(Ms.
Sonia Gokani, J. ) sudhir Top