1. This matter has been placed for orders with the note that "No record available regarding issuing Rule as per order dated 31/3/11. Fresh Rule is required to be issued upon Resp. No.2."
2. Vide order dated 31st March, 2011, this court had passed an order in the following terms:-
"Rule.
Learned APP Ms. Shah waives service of notice of rule for respondent no.1."
3. Thus, vide the above referred order, the court had issued rule. Since there are two respondents, it goes without saying that when rule had been waived on behalf of respondent No.1 alone, registry was required to issue rule to the second respondent. However, it appears that the registry at the relevant time has not issued rule and thereafter, placed this matter before this court for issuance of fresh rule. Thus, on account of negligence/laxity on the part of the Registry, precious judicial time is needlessly wasted. Under the circumstances, Registrar (Judicial) shall look into the matter and explain as to why no rule had been issued at the relevant time qua respondent No.2. Matter to be posted on 19th March, 2012.
( Harsha Devani, J. ) hki Top