Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ramu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31653 of 2019 Applicant :- Ramu Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Yogesh Kumar Srivastava,Noor Muhammad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dharam Veer Singh
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the name of the applicant is Ramu and not Raunu son of Rakesh and the person named in the F.I.R. is Raunu son of Rakesh. It is further pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicant that accused Raunu is in jail.
Shri Dharam Veer Singh, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. may file their counter affidavit within ten days.
List on 9.12.2019.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 o.k.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2019
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Yogesh Kumar Srivastava Noor Muhammad