Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ramu vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8918 of 2021 Applicant :- Ramu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Zafar Abbas Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Faheem Ahmad, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as the learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed the present offence. It is further submitted that applicant is in jail since 14.4.2017. Trial has commenced and informant and victim have been examined but both have not supported the prosecution case. At this juncture, learned counsel for the applicant referred to statements recorded during trial and submitted that no prima facie case is made out against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that in case applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as the learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, complicity of accused, scrutinizing the facts mentioned in the F.I.R., statements recorded in the matter and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Ramu involved in Case Crime No. 805 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and 4 POCSO Act, P.S. Kotwali, District - Lalitpur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
The party shall file self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021 safi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramu vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 August, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Zafar Abbas