Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Ramu vs Rakesh Kumar Srivastava & Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 April, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Sri D.R. Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide an interim order dated 09.11.2009, passed in writ petition No. 7041 (S/S) of 2009, this Court has given a direction to the opposite parties to ensure the payment of salary for the period when the petitioner had discharged his duties.
Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner had discharged his duties as Anuchar (Sevak) for the period 18.06.2004-28.08.2009. But no payment has been made to him.
On the other hand, Sri Rakesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the services of the petitioner were terminated as he was appointed illegally. The termination is the subject-matter of the writ petition.
After hearing both the parties, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled for the salary prior to the termination for the aforesaid period when he has discharged his duties.
In view of above, I direct the opposite parties i.e. BSA and Finance and Accounts Officer, Sitapur to remain present along with the entire record pertaining to the petitioner on the next date of listing.
Learned Standing counsel shall ensure the presence of both the officers concerned, on the next date of listing.
List on 24.04.2012.
Order Date :- 19.4.2012 Nitesh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramu vs Rakesh Kumar Srivastava & Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 April, 2012
Judges
  • Satish Chandra