Court No. - 16
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15985 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ramu Verma And 13 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhan Gupta,Abhishek Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anjali Upadhya,Bhanu Bhushan Jauhari
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents Shri Mayank Singh holding brief of Shri B.B.Jauhari.
Shri B.B.Jauhari has filed memo of appearance on behalf of Greater NOIDA, which is taken on record.
Shri Mayank Singh has informed this Court that the petitioners had earlier filed a writ petition which was decided by a detailed order on 10.07.2013. He has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioners however says that a fresh cause of action has arisen after the Government Order dated 24.02.2016 and the petitioners may be allowed to make a representation in accordance with the aforesaid Government Order before the authority concerned i.e. the Chief Executive Officer, Greater NOIDA (respondent no. 3), which may be directed to be decided in accordance with law.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of without entering into the controversy raised with a direction to the petitioners to make a representation to the respondent no.
3 within a period of two weeks from today. The respondent no. 3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months.
Order Date :- 27.7.2018 VR