Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ramkesh Saroj vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30751 of 2019 Applicant :- Ramkesh Saroj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Rai,Shyam Narain Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mayank Mishra, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against four accused persons, namely Ram Awadh, Sahab, Ramkesh and Kapil alleging that on 27/28.5.2019 they killed Dharmprakash by shot fire. According to postmortem report, one penetrating wound and two abrasions were found on the body of deceased.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that co- accused namely Ram Awadh Saroj has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.7.2019 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29951 of 2019, since the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no independent witness and no legal evidence against the applicant. There are general allegations against all accused persons. According to F.I.R. they killed deceased by shot fire and according to postmortem report, injury caused with penetrating object. It is not clear from the prosecution case, who is the author of that injury. Offences levelled against the applicant are not attracted in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 2.6.2019 (near about two months) having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let applicant Ramkesh Saroj involved in Case Crime No.
85 of 2019, under Sections 302, 506 IPC, Police Station Raunapaar, District Azamgarh be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramkesh Saroj vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2019
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Sandeep Kumar Rai Shyam Narain Rai