Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39235 of 2019 Applicant :- Ramjit @ Ranjit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Submission is that applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant for ulterior motives. The allegations made in the FIR by the informant against the applicant have not been supported by the victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The age of the victim has been found to be 16 years by the doctor. Hence no offence is made out against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is languishing in jail since 27.06.2019. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted herein above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Ramjit @ Ranjit involved in Case Crime No.115 of 2019, under Sections 363, 366 IPC and Section 3 read with Section 17 POCSO Act, Police Station Wajirganj, District- Budaun be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 SS