Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ramjani vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43339 of 2021 Applicant :- Ramjani Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard Sri Surendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 39 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 307 IPC, Police Station Kheragarh, District Agra, during pendency of trial.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, there is general allegation of marpeet against the applicant and other co-accused. It is next contended that there is a cross case of Case Crime No. 39 of 2021 with regard to the said incident in which 5 persons from the side of the informant has been enlarged on bail. It is next contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the allegation made in both the first information reports will be seen at the time of the trial in order to ascertain, who is the aggressor. It is next contended that role of firing has been assigned to co- accused Arif and the injury report indicates that there are firearm injuries on the body of the injured and the case of the co-accused Arif is distinguishable from the applicant. It is next contended by learned counsel for the applicant that co- accused Ashif @ Asik, who role was identical to that of the applicant, has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 7.9.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31775 of 2021 and therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail. It is lastly contended that the applicant has no other criminal history. He is in jail since 3.9.2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets.
Learned AGA appearing for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts and legal submissions as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Having heard submissions of learned counsel of both sides, considering nature of accusation, severity of punishment in case of conviction, nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let the applicant- Ramjani involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 28.10.2021 Noman
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramjani vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 October, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Joshi
Advocates
  • Surendra Kumar Tripathi