Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Rameshchandra vs Bhavnagar

High Court Of Gujarat|14 March, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the application is called out and taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the applicant is not present.
2. In the writ petition being Special Civil Application No.2910 of 2000, the petitioner has prayed for below mentioned relief:-
"(A) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of quo-warranto against the respondent no.2 who has been selected pursuant to the advertisement dated 25th November, 1999 by holding that the selection and appointment made is absolutely illegal, null and void and is required to be unseated from the post.
(B) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to hold that the petitioner is qualified to be appointed on the post of Controller of Examination and to quash and set aside the selection and appointment of the respondent no.2 to the post of Controller of Examination made by the respondent No.1."
3. Having regard to the subject matter of the writ petition, more particularly the relief prayed for in para (B) of the writ petition, the relief prayed for in present application at para 7(a) cannot be granted. The relief prayed for in the application would be considered at the time when the writ petition is heard and the relief prayed for in para 12(B) of the writ petition is taken into account.
3.1 It is, however, clarified that it will be open to the applicant - original petitioner to make appropriate request in respect of the relief prayed for in this application at the time of hearing of the writ petition.
With the aforesaid clarifications, observations and direction, present application stands disposed of.
(K.M.Thaker, J.) kdc Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rameshchandra vs Bhavnagar

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
14 March, 2012