Pare 14 of the judgement of the Tribunal reads as under:
"14.
After conclusion of issues No. 1 and 2, it is clear that accident had occurred on account of negligence on the part of opponent No.1- driver. So, in the capacity of the driver, he himself as well as the Opponents No.2 and 3, in the capacity of the owners. Owners, are vicariously liable to pay the above concluded amount of compensation in Issue No. 2 to the applicant. Any how, the applicant though have alleged that the Opponent No.4, the Insurance Company with which the offending truck was inured, the applicant could not produce any Insurance Policy against the opponent No.4 and while discussing Issue No.1, we have already discussed that aspect. The driver of the matador was not negligent in occurrence of the accident, and, the opponents No.5 to 7, respectively, who are the driver, owner, Insurance Company of the matador vehicle. In the result, the following order is passed."
However, learned advocate for the appellant will produce on record stating that the lawyer of the Insurance Company was called upon to produce the policy, matter is adjourned to 28.02.2012.
(K.S.JHAVERI , J.) niru* Top