Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ramesh Yadav And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13884 of 2021 Applicant :- Ramesh Yadav And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Jatan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.PC has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dt. 18.3.2019 and cognizance/summoning order dated 24.4.2019 as well as entire proceedings of Special Session Trial No. 233 of 2019, State Vs. Ramesh Yadav and others, arising out of case crime no. 0031 of 2019, under section 324, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)V S.C./S.T. Act P.S. Narahi, District Ballia pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Second, Ballia.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he does not want to press other prayers made in the prayer clause and has only made a prayer for expeditious disposal of his bail application in view of law laid down in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Considering the prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if the applicants appear/ surrender before the court below and apply for bail within one month from today, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
For a period of one month from today or till the applicants appear/ surrender and apply for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.PC is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 R
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramesh Yadav And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 August, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Ram Jatan Yadav