Ramesh vs State Co-Operative

The writ petition was filed in the year 2005 and there was an interim order directing payment of Rs.10,000/- for keeping the recovery proceedings in abeyance for two months. It is not clear as to whether the interim order was complied with or not. In any event, there is no extension of the interim order granted. Hence, there would be no purpose in keeping the writ petition pending. If the loan has not been satisfied as of now, the respondent would be well within their rights to proceed for recovery. The writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // True copy // P.A To Judge.