Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ramesh Kumar Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 30
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 95 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandravir Singh Raghuvanshi,Pramod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent-Gaon Sabha and perused the record.
With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
Present petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent authorities to remove the encroachment/construction made by the respondent no. 6 and 7 over the Gata No. 1334 area 0.134 hectare and Gata No. 1442-Ga area 0.097 hectare situated at village Siddiquepur, Pargana Haveli, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur which are recorded as Navin Parti and Char Marg respectively in the revenue record expeditiously.
In view of the aforesaid, it would serve no purpose to keep the writ petition pending, and therefore, it is directed that petitioner may submit a representation before the Assistant Collector bringing the relevant facts regarding encroachment over the aforesaid plot to the notice of the concerned Assistant Collector who, if no proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 have already been registered in relation to encroachment over the said plot, on receiving the aforesaid representation shall inquire into the allegations made by the petitioner after following the procedure prescribed under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 read with Rule 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016 and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date when the aforesaid representation is filed by the petitioner. In case the allegations of the petitioner are found to be true the Assistant Collector shall ensure that the encroachments over the Gaon Sabha land are removed within a period of one month thereafter unless the order of Assistant Collector is stayed by any superior authority or court in any appeal or revision filed against the order of Assistant Collector.
Insofar as the encroachment on gata no. 1442-Ga i.e. Chakmarg is concerned, authority concerned is at liberty to remove such encroachment in exercise of its powers under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
It is clarified that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the claim as raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition.
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.1.2019/AA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramesh Kumar Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 January, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Birla
Advocates
  • Chandravir Singh Raghuvanshi Pramod Kumar Yadav