Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1690 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
The petitioner is a contractor. He is claiming refund of the G.S.T. from the respondent No.3 in accordance with the provisions of the Government Order dated 08.11.2017.
The petitioner for the above purpose has moved separate applications for separate amounts on 15.12.2017, 18.01.2018 and again on 18.01.2018 before the respondent No.3 but the respondent No.3 has not considered the applications of the petitioner.
In view of the above, we dispose off the writ petition with the direction to the respondent No.3 to consider and decide all the above three applications of the petitioner in accordance with law most expeditiously, if possible, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him.
The writ petition is disposed off with the aforesaid direction.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 Nirmal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Vinay Kumar Mishra