Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Ramesh Chandra Misra vs District Judge Kanpur Dehat And ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 April, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Petitioner was issued notice to engage another counsel pursuant to Court's order dated 11.11.2009. Office report dated 20.4.2012 shows that notice sent by registered post has neither been received back now acknowledgement is received. Service is deemed sufficient.
List revised. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, I have perused the record.
Writ petition is directed against order dated 18.3.93 (annexure - 1) passed by Prescribed Authority, Kanpur Dehat, and order dated 3.2.1994, passed by District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, rejecting the petitioner's application under section 5 Limitation Act Having gone through the impugned order as also the pleadings and grounds taken in writ petition, I find no ground to interfere as there is no error apparent on the face of the impugned order warranting interference.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.
Any interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.4.2012 sks-grade iv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramesh Chandra Misra vs District Judge Kanpur Dehat And ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 April, 2012
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal