Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ramayan vs State Of U P And Others & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 61793 of 2017 Petitioner :- Ramayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Kumar Pandey,Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Connected with
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5999 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shivchand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Kumar Pandey,Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the instructions supplied by the learned Standing Counsel, both the writ petitions are rendered infructuous as the orders impugned have been withdrawn.
In view of the above statement, both the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 30.1.2019 Brijesh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramayan vs State Of U P And Others & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 January, 2019
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sharad Kumar Pandey Santosh Kumar Singh
  • Sharad Kumar Pandey Santosh Kumar Singh