IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT C.R.P.No.64/2018 BETWEEN:
1. MR.RAMANANTHA GUPTA BYSANI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O SRI.SATYANARAYANA GUPTA 2. MR.BADARI VISHAL S AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA GUPTA BOTH THE APPELLANT NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT BHAGYALAKSHMI NIVAS NO.21/1, 3RD CROSS SHANKARAPURAM BANGALORE – 560 004.
3. MR.B.A.SRINATH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O B.S. ADINARAYANA GUPTA R/AT – 75, SURVEYOR STREET BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE – 04.
4. MR.SHASANK B GUPTA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O B.A. SRINIVASA GUPTA R/AT NO.16, VANI VILAS ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE – 560 004.
5. MRS. SUDHA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS W/O K.L. RAJENDRA PRASAD R/AT 44/1, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH CROSS 10TH MAIN, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE – 560 003.
(BY SRI.S.D.M. PRASAD, ADV.) AND:
1. SRI.N.RAMESH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE NARAYANA SAMAIYYA R/AT NO.89, H BLOCK RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA MYSORE – 22.
2. SRI.SHYAM SUNDER NATH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN R/AT 1/B, NO.7, RICHMOND ROAD BANGALORE – 560 027.
3. SMT. USHA DEVI MALVI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS D/O SMT. VIJAYA DEVI W/O ARUN SITARAM MALVI R/AT “PRANAV”, FLAT 2B, NO.18 8TH MAIN ROAD OPPOSITE MINI MARKET RAJA MAHAL VILAS BANGALORE – 560 080.
4. MS. URMILA DEVI KOTDA SANGANI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS D/O VIJAYA DEVI R/AT NO.4-C, LAKESHORE MANOR GANGADHAR CHETTY ROAD ULSOOR BANGALORE – 560 042.
5. SMT. SHAKUNTALA DEVI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS D/O SMT.VIJAYA DEVI R/AT G-2, BRIGADE PALACE …PETITIONERS NO.19, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE – 560 052.
6. MR.S.KRISHNA MOORTHY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O S.SWAMPPAN R/AT NO.86/A, TRICHI MAIN ROAD SEELANAICKENPATTY P.O SALEM – 636 201.
7. MR.M.MURAGESHAN AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O P.MARIAPPAN R/AT 81-C, EAST GOVINDAPURAM DINDUGAL – 624 001.
8. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER’S OFFICE MYSURU – 570 001. …RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.07.2016 PASSED IN MISC.NO.42/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 33 RULE 1 OF CPC.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of subsequent developments that had taken place, the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for consideration and therefore, seeks to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to revive the same, if necessary.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty as sought for.
Sd/-
JUDGE NG* CT:bms