Ms.K.Bhuvaneswari, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents.
2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action upon his representation dated 26.07.2016.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has given his representation to the 2nd respondent as early as on 26.07.2016, the 2nd respondent has not passed any orders on the same till today.
4. Ms.K.Bhuvaneswari, learned Government Advocate, submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2016 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.07.2016 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to the 4th respondent.
With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of . No costs.