Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ramakant Maurya vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 54
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35060 of 2018 Applicant :- Ramakant Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Prakash Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in case crime no. 153 of 2016, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 D.P.Act, P.S. Jhaganha, District Gorakhpur, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
Supplementary affidavit filed annexing the statement of applicant who is named accused person and has been attributed the role of pouring the kerosene oil upon the deceased. The applicant is languishing in jail since 15.05.2016. By means of supplementary affidavit the applicant has submitted three witnesses has been examined, under the circumstances I am no inclined to exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant. The bail application of the applicant is hereby rejected at this stage.
However considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the trial court is expected to gear up the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, provided the applicant renders fullest cooperation in early conclusion of the trial in the aforementioned period.
Order Date :- 18.9.2018 Abhishek Sri.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramakant Maurya vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 September, 2018
Judges
  • Rahul Chaturvedi
Advocates
  • Prakash Chandra Srivastava