IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No.2161 OF 2016 Between:
Ramachandraiah S/o. Late Chikkegowda Aged about 63 years R/at Chikkegowdana Doddi, Kasaba Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk-562 159 ... Appellant (By Sri. K.Shantharaj, Advocate-Absent) And:
Sri. Kemparamaiah Since dead by his L.Rs., 1(a) K.Devaraju S/o. Late Kemparamaiah Aged about 58 years 1(b) B.K.Ravikumar S/o. Late Kemparamaiah Aged about 47 years 1(c) Bhagyamma D/o. Late Kemparamaiah W/o. Kapani Gowda Aged about 55 years All are residing at Chikkegowdana Doddi Village, Harisandra Post Kasaba Hobli Ramanagara Taluk-562 159 1(d) Sunandamma W/o. Hanumanthe Gowda, D/o. Late Kemparamaiah Since dead by her L.RS.
1(d)(a) Hanume Gowda S/o. Late Lenkappa H/o. Late Sunandamma Age major 1(d)(b) Vasu S/o. Hanume Gowda S/o. Late Sunandamma Aged about 28 years 1(d)(c) Ravi S/o. Hanume Gowda S/o. Late Sunandamma Aged about 28 years 1(d)(a) to 1(d)(c) Are all residing at Gavinagamangala Village Madabal Hobli Magadi Taluk Ramanagara District-562 160 1(e) Radha W/o. Kempanna D/o. Late Kemparamaiah Aged about 50 years R/at Channamarenagowdana Doddi village Sugganahalli Post Kasaba Hobli Ramanagara Taluk-562 159 2. Doddaveeraiah S/o. Late Gunde Gowda @ Veere Gowda R/at Chikkegowdana Doddi village, Kasaba Hobli Ramanagara Taluk-562 159. ... Respondents This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 21.10.2014 passed in RA.No.23/2013 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM., Ramanagara, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2012 passed in OS.NO.190/1993 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC., Ramanagara.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
Judgment None appears for the appellant.
This Court on 04.06.2019, granted time till closure of office hours on 07.06.2019 to take steps for issuance of notice to the respondents, subject to the condition that the appeal shall be dismissed for default if the steps are not taken.
2. The appeal is belated by six hundred and sixty three days. Notice on the application for condonation of delay is issued on 29.03.2019 and no efforts are made even to pay the process fee.
3. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge RB