Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rama Prasad Tiwari vs State Of U P Through Board Of

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 25336 of 1996 Petitioner :- Rama Prasad Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Board Of Revenue Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
“(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents that did not interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner and pay him salary month to month onwards along with back wages.“
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 sailesh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rama Prasad Tiwari vs State Of U P Through Board Of

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Nath Tripathi