Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Veer vs State

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1618 of 1989 Revisionist :- Ram Veer Opposite Party :- State Counsel for Revisionist :- Satish Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by order dated 24.07.1989 passed by Special Judge (Anti Dacoity), Budaun in Criminal Case No. 106 of 1989 summoning the revisionists to face trial under Section 394 I.P.C.
3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Veer vs State

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Satish Trivedi