Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Sumiran vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1305 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Sumiran Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
By means of the present petition, the petitioner has raised grievance that in the village till date no consolidation has taken place under the Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 in the revenue Village Nevada Mukhlispur, Tehsil Badlapur, District Jaunpur and, therefore, the villagers could not get the benefit of the consolidation scheme.
The petitioner submits that they have already moved application on 17.12.2018 before the Consolidation Commissioner, U.P., Lucknow in the above regard.
In the considered opinion of the Court the matter is required to be examined by the Consolidation Commissioner and to pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner. However, it is made clear that before any order is passed the Consolidation Commissioner will necessarily require to have report from the District Magistrate concerned regarding the grievance of the petitioner and after seeking comment from the District Magistrate only, he will pass orders. The necessary action shall be taken by the Consolidation Commissioner within three months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order.
Disposed of.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 Jyotsana
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Sumiran vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • Ajit Kumar
Advocates
  • Kailash Nath Singh