Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2929 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Shankar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Poojan Yadav,Sunil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mangla Prasad Rai
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 and Sri Mangla Prasad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4.
It is admitted by all the counsel for the parties that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the judgement delivered on 12.12.2017 in Writ A No.47490 of 2017 (Km. Pallavi Vs. State of U.P. and others). Following the said judgement another order was passed by this Court in Writ A No.7865 of 2018, which is quoted hereinbelow:-
"Heard Shri Sunil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. Shri A.K. Yadav appears for the respondent no.3.
At the very outset learned counsel for the parties agree that the claim of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgement and order passed in Writ A No.47490 of 2017 (Km. Pallavi vs. State of UP and ors) decided on 12.12.2017 whereby the writ petition was disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in terms of the N.C.T.E. Notifications, expeditiously within two months from the date provided there is no other impediment.
In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is also disposed of with the same terms and directions as given in the writ petition, referred above."
In the facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is also disposed of in same terms and conditions as contained in the order dated 15.3.2018 passed in Writ A No.7865 of 2018.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 saqlain