Hon'ble Yogesh Chandra Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA. No notice is issued to the respondent No.3 in view of the order which is being passed. However, liberty is reserved for respondent No.3 to apply for variation/modification of this order. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the F.I.R being Case Crime No.148 of 2010, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act, Police Station Garautha, District Jhansi.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is a Branch Manager of the bank and joined in the year 2008. He further submits that no offence has been committed by the petitioner.
A perusal of the F.I.R. discloses the commission of offence. We are not satisfied that this is a case for quashing the F.I.R. However, looking to the facts stated in the writ petition and submissions made, we provide that till the report under Section 173(2) Cr.P. C. is submitted, the petitioner shall not be arrested in Case Crime No.148 of 2010, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act, Police Station Garautha, District Jhansi.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 29.6.2010 NS