Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30147 of 2001 Petitioner :- Ram Sajeevan Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikash Budhwar,Ankush Tandon,Rakesh Kr. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Radhey Shyam,Rajesh Dwivedi,Rakesh Bahadur,Satish Dwivedi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record and quashing the impugned order dated 26th May, 2001 passed by District Inspector of Schools, Allahabad (Annexure No. 8 to this writ petition)
ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the selection and appointment of respondent no. 5 as Class-IV employee including the approval of the District Inspector of Schools, Allahabad dated 27th November, 2000 as null and void and inoperative in the eyes of law.
iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to pay salary to the respondent no. 5.
iv) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to hold fresh selection for the Class-IV post in the institution in accordance with the law after determining the quota and the point on the roster in respect of the said vacancy afresh.
v) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to interfere in the working of the petitioner and to pay salary to the petitioner for the periods during which petitioner actually working in the institution.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 PS