Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Raj vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8699 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Raj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Das Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.
Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the nomenclature of respondent-7.
Heard Dr. Ghanshyam Das Mishra for the petitioner, Standing Counsel for State of U.P. and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra for respondents-2 to 7.
This writ petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondents to pay the post retiral benefits of the petitioner.
It has been stated that the petitioner retired from the post of Draftsman on 31.10.2015, but his post retiral dues has not been paid till today. The petitioner has moved a representation in this respect, which is pending.
The writ petition is disposed of directing the Chief Account Officer (respondent-5) and Executive Engineer (respondent-7) to decide the representation of the petitioner, by a reasoned and speaking order, within two months from the date of producing a certified copy of this order before them.
Order Date :- 28.3.2018 Jaideep/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Raj vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 March, 2018
Judges
  • Ram Surat
Advocates
  • Ghanshyam Das Mishra