Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Raj Patel vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30777 of 2019 Applicant :- Ram Raj Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Harendra Prakash Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Mohd.
Nadeem, learned A.G.A. for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 25.7.2019 in Case Crime No.123 of 2003 under Sections 302, 307, 506 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act passed in ST No.508 of 2004 and ST No.671 of 2004 by which the trial court has rejected application No.247 Kha filed under Section 311 CrPC.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with mala fide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. It is further contended that the order impugned has been passed without application of mind and is liable to be quashed.
I have perused the impugned order which shows that the court concerned while rejecting the application No.247 Kha filed under Section 311 CrPC has clearly observed that the application has been given after 14 years when the statements of PW-1 and PW-2 have been recorded. Even otherwise, the court concerned has given categorical findings to the following effect:-
fnukad 15-2-2005 dks vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 dh ftjg vfHk;qDrx.k jkeHkou] jkevkljs] ';ke Hkkjrh o Jherh HkxoUrk nsoh dh rjQ ls vyx ls fd;k x;k rFkk ftjg ds i`"B la0 6 ij ;g vafdr gS fd ftjg jkejkt dh vksj ls **;g dguk xyr gS fd >wBh xokgh ns jgk gwWA** ftlls ;g Li"V gS fd vfHk;qDr jkejkt dh vksj ls ek= lts'ku fn;k x;k dksbZ iz'u ugha iwNk x;k ftlls ;g ekuk tk;sxk fd vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 ls jkejkt dh rjQ ls vU; dksbZ iz'u ugha iwNuk FkkA fnukad 15-2-2005 dks vfHk;qDr Hkh mifLFkr jgk gS vkSj vkns'k i= ij mlds gLrk{kj gSaA tgkW rd vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 2 dk iz'u gS] mlls vfHk;qDr jkeHkou] jkevkljs] ';ke Hkkjrh rFkk HkxoUrk nsoh vfHk;qDrk }kjk vyx ls ftjg dh x;h gS vkSj vfHk;qDr jkejkt ds mifLFkr gksus ds ckotwn mldh rjQ ls ftjg ugha fd;k x;k ftlls ;g ekuk tk;sxk fd bl lk{kh ls vfHk;qDr dks ftjg ugha djuk Fkk D;kasfd vfHk;qDr bl lk{kh dh eq[; ijh{kk o ftjg ds le; Hkh mifLFkr jgkA vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 o 2 dk c;ku lu~ 2005 eas gh ijkw gks pqdk Fkk rFkk blds ckn vfHk;kstu lHkh lkf{k;kas ds ijhf{kr gkuss ds i'pkr c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 313 na0iz0la0 vafdr gqvk vkSj cpko i{k dh rjQ ls dksbZ lk{; u fn;s tkus ds dkj.k i=koyh dkQh le;
ls cgl eas py jgh gS vr% izkFkukZ i= fujLr fd;s tkus ;kX;s gSA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gS fd ,l0Vh0ua0 671@2004 LVsV cuke jkejkt l= U;k;ky; dks lqiqnZ fd;s tkus ds i'pkr fnukad 5-8-2004 dks vfHk;qDr jkejkt ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr fd;k x;kA pwWfd vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 dk c;ku ,l0Vh0 ua0 508@2004 LVsV cuke jkeHkou iVsy vkfn dh i=koyh eas gks pqdk Fkk ftlls ,l0Vh0 ua0 671@04 dh i=koyh eas vfHk;ktus lk{kh la0 1 dh eq[; ijh{kk fnukWd 25-1-2005 dks fy[kh x;h vkSj vkns'k fnukad 25-1-2005 }kjk gh rhukas i=kofy;kas dks ,dtkbZ fd;k x;kA fnukad 15-2-2005 dks vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 dh ftjg vfHk;qDrx.k jkeHkou] jkevkljs] ';ke Hkkjrh o Jherh HkxoUrk nsoh dh rjQ ls vyx ls fd;k x;k rFkk ftjg ds i`"B la0 6 ij ;g vafdr gS fd ftjg jkejkt dh vksj ls ek= lts'ku fn;k x;k vkSj dksbZ ftjg ugha fd;k ftlls lts'ku ls ;g vafdr gS fd ;g dguk xyr gS fd >wBh xokgh ns jgk gwWA **ftlls ;g Li"V gS fd vfHk;qDr jkejkt dh vksj ls ek= lts'ku fn;k x;k dksbZ iz'u ugha iwNk x;k ftlls ;g ekuk tk;sxk fd vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 ls jkejkt dh rjQ ls vU; dksbZ iz'u ugha iwNuk FkkA fnukad 15-2- 2005 dks vfHk;qDr Hkh mifLFkr jgk gS vkSj vkns'k i= ij mlds gLrk{kj gSaA tgkW rd vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 2 dk iz'u gS] mlls vfHk;qDr jkeHkou] jkevkljs] ';ke Hkkjrh rFkk HkxoUrk nsoh vfHk;qDrk }kjk vyx ls ftjg dh x;h gS vkSj vfHk;qDr jkejkt ds mifLFkr gksus ds ckotwn mldh rjQ ls ftjg ugha fd;k x;k ftlls ;g ekuk tk;sxk fd bl lk{kh ls vfHk;qDr dks ftjg ugha djuk Fkk D;kasfd vfHk;qDr bl lk{kh dh eq[; ijh{kk o ftjg ds le; Hkh mifLFkr jgkA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Hkh Li"V gS fd i=koyh fnukad 6-6-16 ls cgl gsrq py jgh gS ftleas fnukda 1-6-16 dks c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 313 na0iz0la0 vafdr gqvk gS vfHk;kstu ds ftu lkf{k;kas ls izfr ijh{kk fd;s tkus dk dFku fd;k x;k gS mudk c;ku lu~ 2005 eas vfdra gvq k gS rFkk vfHk;ktus lk{kh la0 1 ftlesa vfHk;qDr jkejkt dh rjQ ls ftjg eas ek= i`"B l0a 6 ij lt'kus fn;k x;k gS blds vykok vU; dksbZ iz'u ugha iwNk x;k gS rFkk vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 2 ls Hkh vfHk;qDr dh rjQ ls dksbZ iz'u iwNk ugha x;k gS tcfd c;ku ftl fnu fy[kk x;k Fkk ml fnu vfHk;qDr mifLFkr jgk ftlls ;g mi/kkfjr fd;k tk;sxk fd bu lkf{k;kas ls vfHk;qDr jkejkt ds vf/koDrk dks ftjg ugha djuk FkkA vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 o 2 ds c;ku ntZ gksus ds yxHkx 14 o"kZ ckn vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 1 o 2 ls ftjg djus gsrq izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 311 na0iz0la0 fn;k x;k gS ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd izkFkZuk i= ek= cgl dks fuokfjr djus ds fy, fn;k x;k gS ftlls i=koyh dk fuLrkj.k u fd;k tk ldsA blds iwoZ vfHk;kstu lk{kh la0 11 dks ftjg gsrq ryc djus gsrq izkFkZuk i= 225 [k fn;k x;k Fkk ftls fujLr djrs gq, i=koyh cgl gsrq fu;r dh x;h ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k eas ls fdlh u fdlh rjQ ls ckj&2 i=koyh dks foyfEcr djus ds fy, izkFkZuk i= fn;k tk jgk gS ftlls i=koyh dk fuLrkj.k ugha fd;k tk ldsA i=koyh vR;Ur izkphu gS vkSj izkFkZuk i= ls ek= foyEc dk ea'kk izdV gks jgh gSA leLr rF;kas ,oa ifjfLFkfr;kas dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the order impugned as well as averments made in the present application, this Court is of the opinion that the learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any legal infirmity in the order impugned which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of power conferred under 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the application lacks merit and is rejected.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019 SP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Raj Patel vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 August, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Harendra Prakash Dwivedi