Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 59
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38759 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kukmar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satyam Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Abhishek Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent bank.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from him.
Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the respondent-Bank out of which petitioner has not paid substantial amount. Petitioner submits that he is ready to deposit balance amount in easy installment. Learned counsel for the Bank states that the anxiety of the Bank is that the amount should be recovered back.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the following directions:-
(i) Petitioner may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly in concerned Bank in four equal installments.
(ii) The first installment shall be deposited within one month from today, and the other installment shall be deposited at interval of three months. These deposits shall be made before the Branch of the Bank from where the loan was taken.
(iii) Recovery proceedings during this period will be kept in abeyance. In case, petitioner commits default in depositing any of the installments within the above stipulated time, it will be open to the respondents to resume the recovery proceedings again by taking coercive process.
(iv) Petitioner may file an application for supply of statement of account along with the duly stamped self addressed envelope. In case, any such application is filed, the concerned branch of the Bank will give the same to the petitioner within 15 days, after deposit of the first installment. The statement of account will reflect the amount deposited till then and the balance amount still to be paid.
(v) This order will not affect any auction, if it has already taken place. In that event, the petitioner may take appropriate legal proceedings to set aside the auction under U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act and Rules 1952 or file a suit in accordance with law.
(vi) If any fact stated by the petitioner is found to be incorrect, it will be open for the bank authorities to move an application for modification/recall of the order.
(vii) In case all the instalments are deposited as per the schedule fixed by this order, the recovery of the collection charges would remain in abeyance till such time the Collector decides the application that may be filed by the petitioner for determining collection charges/fee as per the legal provisions and also taking into consideration the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Maharajwa and others versus State of U.P. and others, reported in 2013(1) ADJ 426 (FB). Upon determination of collection charges/fee the Collector will communicate the same to the petitioner and upon communication of the same it would be open to the petitioner to either deposit the same within a period of 30 days or if not satisfied with the same, may assail the order of the Collector in appropriate proceedings.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 29.11.2019 skv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Manoj Kumar Gupta
Advocates
  • Santosh Kukmar Tiwari