Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Challenge in this petition has been made to the order dated 2.4.2009 passed by the trial court consolidating three suits as well as revisional order dismissing the revision. A perusal of the impugned order goes to show that a finding has been recorded that since the subject matter of the three suits are the same and are to be decided on the basis of the same evidence and therefore, they may be consolidated. Revisional court has also affirmed the said finding. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in one of the suit one additional plot is involved and therefore, the subject matter is not same and the three suits ought not to have been consolidated.
The argument is misconceived. Even if one of the plot involved in one of the suit is different, a perusal of the plaint goes to show that other subject matter of the suits are exactly same and therefore, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned orders. The petition stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 2.2.2010 nd