Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Pal Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41509 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lavkush Kumar Bhatt,Vinay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
The petitioner is having an ex parte decree dated 2.3.2007 in Suit No.231 of 2003 against the respondent No.6 in respect of the property in dispute but as respondent No.6 is said to be a powerful politician, the petitioner is not being benefited by the said decree.
Be that as it may, since the petitioner is having a decree in his favour, he may get it executed or if necessary, apply for the disobedience of the same before the court concerned. The writ petition for the above purpose is not the proper remedy.
With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 LN Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Pal Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Lavkush Kumar Bhatt Vinay Kumar Pandey