Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Niranjan vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30472 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Niranjan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Sharma,R S Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
The petitioner has filed this petition for a direction upon the bank to accepts the outstanding amount in installments excluding the recovery charges.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the averments made in the writ petition, we do not find any cause of action for the petitioner to file this petition as neither there is any recovery nor any other proceeding against the petitioner for realizing any outstanding amount. There is no application of the petitioner for even making the payment in installments before the bank.
In view of above, in our opinion, the writ petition is completely misconceived and is accordingly, dismissed.
After the order is dictated dismissing the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition at this stage.
In view of the request so made, the writ petition may be treated to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Sattyarth
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Niranjan vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 September, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Alok Sharma R S Dubey